<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do you describe Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Comedy Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-18522</link>
		<dc:creator>Comedy Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-18522</guid>
		<description>Well, that takes care of my interest in Vista.  Thanks for the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that takes care of my interest in Vista.  Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Irizarry</title>
		<link>http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-14544</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Irizarry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-14544</guid>
		<description>Jeremy - I have to agree. Add some more weight on there for the analogy. I also spent some time with the beta which was horrendously slow on a system that was previously quite fast under XP. The final release improved things significantly over the beta but it still lags well behind XP. As Matt mentions, its no different from previous version upgrades but I've yet to see any benefit from Vista. I could do everything I needed under XP and much faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy - I have to agree. Add some more weight on there for the analogy. I also spent some time with the beta which was horrendously slow on a system that was previously quite fast under XP. The final release improved things significantly over the beta but it still lags well behind XP. As Matt mentions, its no different from previous version upgrades but I&#8217;ve yet to see any benefit from Vista. I could do everything I needed under XP and much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-14033</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 06:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-14033</guid>
		<description>After beta testing Vista for over a year, then installing the final release, I have to say I can't stand it.  I kept telling myself that bogged down feeling I got while using it was due to the fact that the it was still in beta.  I was wrong.  To top off the slow factor, they rearranged things that only made using Vista more confusing (as you noted).

I would make the 70lbs analogy more like 150lbs.  I kicked Vista off of my computers about a week after the official release.  XP and Linux from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After beta testing Vista for over a year, then installing the final release, I have to say I can&#8217;t stand it.  I kept telling myself that bogged down feeling I got while using it was due to the fact that the it was still in beta.  I was wrong.  To top off the slow factor, they rearranged things that only made using Vista more confusing (as you noted).</p>
<p>I would make the 70lbs analogy more like 150lbs.  I kicked Vista off of my computers about a week after the official release.  XP and Linux from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koobs</title>
		<link>http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-12223</link>
		<dc:creator>Koobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-12223</guid>
		<description>Nice analogy.  My thoughts so far have been it seems like a nicer looking, bloated xp, I haven't really noticed anything 'amazing' as far as usability except the much improved search located in the start menu, but I have not used it heavily though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analogy.  My thoughts so far have been it seems like a nicer looking, bloated xp, I haven&#8217;t really noticed anything &#8216;amazing&#8217; as far as usability except the much improved search located in the start menu, but I have not used it heavily though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-11024</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.propstm.net/2007/03/15/how-do-you-describe-vista/#comment-11024</guid>
		<description>Alyssa,  dependant upon the user the frustration that people face with Vista's resource heavy requirements seem to be par for the course with the increased requirements from other releases of Windows.  Despite having to trudge around with this "70lb weight on my back" I also realize Microsoft wont be releasing another OS for probably about another 5 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alyssa,  dependant upon the user the frustration that people face with Vista&#8217;s resource heavy requirements seem to be par for the course with the increased requirements from other releases of Windows.  Despite having to trudge around with this &#8220;70lb weight on my back&#8221; I also realize Microsoft wont be releasing another OS for probably about another 5 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
